Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January 2002). Notes. This South Africa-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it This
Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January 2002) Download original files. PDF format. RTF format. Bookmark/share this page.
4. Joy Mining Machinery carries on business nationally as a manufacturer, supplier and service provider in respect of machinery to the mining industry. Joy Mining employs about 800 employees. Joy Mining, with the support of the representative union and
Joy Mining Machinery carries on business nationally as a manufacturer, supplier and service provider in respect of machinery to the mining industry. Joy Mining employs about 800 employees. Joy Mining, with the support of the representative union and most non-union employees, wishes to test its employees for HIV in order to determine the
The short case name is ascribed by UNCTAD. Typically it is the first word of a corporate claimant’s name, an abbreviation of the corporate claimant’s name, or the last name of a natural-person claimant “v.” the short version of the respondent State’s name.
Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11. Case type: International Investment Agreement. Claimant(s): Joy Mining Machinery Limited. Respondent state: Egypt. Applicable arbitration rules: ICSID. Investment treaty: Egypt-United Kingdom BIT.
Joy Mining Machinery Division of Harnischfeger (SA) (Pty) Ltd v NUMSA & others [2002] 9453 (LC) Mini Summary. Reasons were provided by the court for an order made earlier, condoning non-compliance with rule 7 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court, and authorising the applicant to conduct HIV tests on certain employees.
The Metal and Machinery Workers Industrial Union No. 440 (MMWIU) was a labor union in the United States which existed from 1907 to 1950. It organized workers in the manufacturing industry and was affiliated with the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW).
Joy Mining Machinery Mining Center 85/1, Topsia Road South, Kolkata-700046, West Bengal, India
Joy Mining Machinery v National Union of Metal Workers of South . Dec 1, 2000 . Joy Mining Machinery applied to the South African Labour Court for permission to Steeldale and Wadeville plants on 21 September 2001. JOY GLOBAL (AFRICA) (PTY) LTD, Germiston .
Joy Mining Machinery Division of Harnischfeger (SA) (Pty) Ltd v NUMSA & others [2002] 9453 (LC) Mini Summary. Reasons were provided by the court for an order made earlier, condoning non-compliance with rule 7 of the Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Labour Court, and authorising the applicant to conduct HIV tests on certain employees.
Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA Wikipedia. In Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA, an important case in South African labour law, the court held that the following considerations should be taken into account in determining whether or not HIV testing by employers of their employees is justifiable: Komatsu Mining Careers Komatsu Mining Corp.
Joy Mining Machinery v National Union of Metal Workers of South Dec 1, 2000 Joy Mining Machinery applied to the South African Labour Court for permission [4] Joy Mining Machinery carries on business nationally as a caselaw_19.pdf
Dec 20, 2018· In the case of Joy Mining Machinery, A Division of Harnischfeger (SA) (Pty)Ltd v National Union of Metal Workers of SA and Others (2002) 23 IJL391 (SC), Joy Mining Machinery approached the Labour Court to get permission to arrange HIV testing for its employees.
Joy Mining Machinery carries on business nationally as a manufacturer, supplier and service provider in respect of machinery to the mining industry. Joy Mining employs about 800 employees. Joy Mining, with the support of the representative union and most non-union employees, wishes to test its employees for HIV in order to determine the
5 Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January 2002) para 3. 6 David Goos Organizing Aids Workplace and Organizational Responses to the HIV/AIDS Epidemic 9.
DeliveredCitationCourt 2016 12 14 Vermooten v DPE Ors (JA 91-15) JHB 2016 12 08 Vanchem Vanadium V National Union of Metalworkers (JA 33-16) JHB 2016
Joy Mining Machinery Limited V-Jaw Crusher. Joy Mining Machinery Limited V Egypt Icsid Case No Arb. The international centre for settlement of investment disputes icsid or the centre received a request for arbitration under cover of a letter dated february 26 2003 against the arab republic of egypt egypt or the respondent from joy mining machinery limited joy mining or the claimant a company
Jul 07, 2010· Irvin & Johnson v Trawler & Line Fishing Union (2003) 24 ILJ 565 (LC) Joy Mining Machinery v National Union of Metalworkers of SA and Others (2002) 23 ILJ 391 (LC). C v Minister of Correctional Services 1996 (4) SA 292 (T) 10 August Employment law Umunyana Rugege Lecture slides. Prescribed Readings:
The saliva test endorsed by Landman J in Joy Mining Machinery (supra) is probably the least invasive method of testing. Ltd v National Union of Metalworkers of SA & Others [2002] 4 BLLR 372 ((2002) 23 ILJ 391) 477 Speaker of The National Assembly v
joy mining machinery a division of harnischfeger (south africa) (pty) limited and national union of metal workers of south africa ("numsa"), national employees trade union ("netu") in the labour court of south africa case no: j 158/02 per landman j. 2. the case.
Joy Manufacturing, trading as Joy Mining Machinery, is a subsidiary of the American holding company Harnischfeger Industries Inc., currently operating under US Bankruptcy Code Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Internationally the treatment of the Moss Vale workers is generating concern.
Joy Mining Machinery Mining Weekly. US company Joy Mining Machinery has more than 90 years experience as a global leader in the development, manufacture, distribution and service of underground mining machinery and systems for the extraction of coal and other embedded materials. Subsidiary Joy Mining Machinery South Africa is one of .
Dec 20, 2018· In the case of Joy Mining Machinery, A Division of Harnischfeger (SA) (Pty)Ltd v National Union of Metal Workers of SA and Others (2002) 23 IJL391 (SC), Joy Mining Machinery approached the Labour Court to get permission to arrange HIV testing for its employees.
Joy Manufacturing, trading as Joy Mining Machinery, is a subsidiary of the American holding company Harnischfeger Industries Inc., currently operating under US Bankruptcy Code Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Internationally the treatment of the Moss Vale workers is generating concern.
Mining Equipment Manufacturer Will Refrain From Requesting, Requiring or Purchasing Genetic Information PITTSBURGH Joy Underground Mining, LLC, trading as Joy Mining Machinery, will provide significant relief to settle a federal genetic information discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEOC), the agency announced today.
5 Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January 2002) para 3. 6 David Goos Organizing Aids Workplace and Organizational Responses to the HIV/AIDS Epidemic 9.
Joy Mining Machinery Ltd Wadeville. Joy mining machinery v national union of metal workers of south dec 1, 2000 joy mining machinery applied to the south african labour court for permission to conduct and service provider in respect of machinery to the mining industry. joy .. steeldale and wadeville plants on
Joy Mining Machinery v National Union of Metal Workers J158/02; `{`2002`}` ZALC 7 Keywords: employment, confidentiality, counseling, HIV status, informed choice, testing Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign `{`2002`}` ZACC 15; 2002 (5) SA 721; 2002 (10) BCLR 103
Joy Mining Machinery Limited V-Jaw Crusher. Joy Mining Machinery Limited V Egypt Icsid Case No Arb. The international centre for settlement of investment disputes icsid or the centre received a request for arbitration under cover of a letter dated february 26 2003 against the arab republic of egypt egypt or the respondent from joy mining machinery limited joy mining or the claimant a company
DeliveredCitationCourt 2016 12 14 Vermooten v DPE Ors (JA 91-15) JHB 2016 12 08 Vanchem Vanadium V National Union of Metalworkers (JA 33-16) JHB 2016
The saliva test endorsed by Landman J in Joy Mining Machinery (supra) is probably the least invasive method of testing. Ltd v National Union of Metalworkers of SA & Others [2002] 4 BLLR 372 ((2002) 23 ILJ 391) 477 Speaker of The National Assembly v
Compare pay for popular roles and read about the team’s work-life balance. Uncover why JOY MINING MACHINERY is . 4.3/5; Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA Wikipedia. Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January
AR 146. According to the Joy Mining Machinery “Global Caplight” article, dated July 29, 2005, the subject firm opened a new, larger production facility in Lebanon, Kentucky that is “scheduled to open in the fall of 2005” and will “manufacture shuttle cars, rebuild motors and rebuild AFC gearcases.” AR 126.
Joy Technologies Inc., d/b/a Joy Mining Machinery: 8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.) 14-CA-028851: Abbott Ambulance of Illinois, Inc. 8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.) 14-CA-029234: National Maintenance and Repair, Inc. 8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.)
The Applicant, Joy Mining Machinery, was a manufacturer, supplier and service provider of mining machinery. The Applicant had attempted to determine the extent of HIV prevalence at its workplace by commissioning a study of HIV prevalence based on the demographic groups at the workplace.
Aug 22, 2012· The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction (12 Nov 2004) [hereinafter " Salini "]; and Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Decision on Jurisdiction (6 August 2004).
AR 146. According to the Joy Mining Machinery “Global Caplight” article, dated July 29, 2005, the subject firm opened a new, larger production facility in Lebanon, Kentucky that is “scheduled to open in the fall of 2005” and will “manufacture shuttle cars, rebuild motors and rebuild AFC gearcases.” AR 126.
Mining Equipment Manufacturer Will Refrain From Requesting, Requiring or Purchasing Genetic Information PITTSBURGH Joy Underground Mining, LLC, trading as Joy Mining Machinery, will provide significant relief to settle a federal genetic information discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity (EEOC), the agency announced today.
The Applicant, Joy Mining Machinery, was a manufacturer, supplier and service provider of mining machinery. The Applicant had attempted to determine the extent of HIV prevalence at its workplace by commissioning a study of HIV prevalence based on the demographic groups at the workplace.
[16] As Landman J pointed out in Joy Mining Machinery, a Division of Harnischfeger (SA) (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Metal Workers of SA & Others (2002) 23 ILJ 391 (LC), section 7(2) is not happily worded. It contemplates a determination of justifiability in terms of
Joy Mining Machinery v National Union of Metal Workers J158/02; `{`2002`}` ZALC 7 Keywords: employment, confidentiality, counseling, HIV status, informed choice, testing Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign `{`2002`}` ZACC 15; 2002 (5) SA 721; 2002 (10) BCLR 103
Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) 2002 ZALC 7 NM v Smith 2007 5 SA 250 (CC) Perreira v Buccleuch Montessori Pre-school and Primary (Pty) Ltd 2003 ZAGPHC 1
Aug 22, 2012· The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/13, Decision on Jurisdiction (12 Nov 2004) [hereinafter " Salini "]; and Joy Mining Machinery Limited v. The Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11, Decision on Jurisdiction (6 August 2004).
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Fohlisa and others v Hendor Mining Supplies (a division of MarschalkBeleggings (Pty) Ltd)[2017] 6 BLLR 539 (CC) National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Its Members in the employ of the Respondent v Transnet SOC Ltd (JS427/15) [2018] ZALCJHB 352 (31 October 2018)
Compare pay for popular roles and read about the team’s work-life balance. Uncover why JOY MINING MACHINERY is . 4.3/5; Joy Mining Machinery v NUMSA Wikipedia. Joy Mining Machinery a division of Harnischfeger (South Africa) (Pty) Limited v National Union of Metal Workers of South Africa (NUMSA) and Others (J 158/02) [2002] ZALC 7 (31 January
Subsequently, the Salini test was elaborated in Joy Mining Machinery Ltd v. Egypt, Award on Jurisdiction, Decision of 30 July 2004, ICSID Case No ARB/03/11) (2004) 19 ICSID Rev. 486, para. 50 [Joy Mining].
The parties to the dispute settled out of court based on the stipulation that the policies of the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) concerning the recruitment, deployment and promotion of people living with HIV were unconstitutional. Irvin and Johnson Ltd. v. Trawler and Line Fishing Union, et al. Joy Mining Machinery v. NUMSA; J
Nov 16, 2018· Joy Mining Machinery Limited v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/11) (introductory note on 6 August 2004, award on 6 August 2004 and order of the annulment committee pursuant to ICSID
Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC (GGNSC) Springfield LLC d/b/a Golden Living Center Springfield 8(a)(1) Coercive Statements (Threats, Promises of Benefits, etc.) 26-CA-087573
Below you will find a list of 2,213 asbestos companies we have successfully fought on behalf of the clients we represent. We fought to prove the asbestos exposure these companies are responsible for, and continue the fight every day.